Sequence did not affect the estimates of heterogeneity.Table Descriptive statistics
Sequence didn’t impact the estimates of heterogeneity.Table Descriptive statistics wallet items (greater scores indicate additional trust, Ni )J.Tolsma, T.W.G.van der MeerWallet item Coethnic neighbour Noncoethnic neighbour Unknown neighbour Unknown nonneighbourMean ….SD ….Min Max responses towards the wallet products demonstrated a clear hierarchy, in line with the anticipated ethnic hierarchy (see Table).On average, unknown neighbours are viewed as less trustworthy than Moroccan neighbours and (unknown) individuals outdoors the neighbourhood are trusted the least.Mokken scale analysis (Van Schuur) confirms that this trust hierarchy is not only observed at the aggregate level but additionally within people (scalability coefficient H is SE ).Covariates at the IndividualLevelOur exclusive concentrate on native Dutch respondents ensures that egoethnicityeffects usually do not interfere with our model.We do contain handle variables for other person level determinants of trust.Gender with males coded as and females as .Age is defined by year of birth.Education is measured in years.Labour market place position is coded in three categories `employed’; `unemployed’ and `nonemployed’.The latter category contains students, pensioners, housewives as well as the disabled.We also handle for net household revenue.Respondents could choose in between different revenue ranges.We used the midpoint values and took the all-natural logarithm to take into account the skewed revenue distribution.Missing values on this constructed income variable were replaced together with the grand mean.Denomination consists on the categories `no denomination’, `Catholic’, `Protestants’ and `other religion’.The two respondents with missing values for this measure had been deleted in the sample.A second indicator of religiosity is church attendance measured inside the following categories; `never’, `about as soon as per year’, `about as soon as per month’, `about as soon as per week’ and recoded in instances per year.All respondentsincluding those with out a denominationwere asked about their church attendance.Household composition was determined primarily based on marital status (single vs.married) and no matter whether respondents had youngsters who did or did not PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21318159 reside at house.This resulted in categories `single, no children’, `single, no children [DTrp6]-LH-RH chemical information living at home’, `single, young children living at home’, `couple, no children’, `couple, no kids living at home’, `couple, youngsters living at home’.The six respondents with missing values for this measure have been deleted from the sample.Self Rated Wellness is assessed using a single item `In general, how do you rate your health’ with answer categories `excellent’, `very good’, `good’, `fair’, `poor’.All continuous covariates have been zstandardized.Our operating sample consists of individuals.Descriptive statistics for covariates in the individuallevel are summarized in “Appendix ”.Additional analyses demonstrated that alternative approaches to cope with missing values (i.e.earnings as categorical variable having a category for `missing’ and several imputation together with the R package mice) result in almost identical final results.Provided the amount of models we have to run we opted to describe final results on the tactic as described inside the main text.Losing Wallets, Retaining Trust The Partnership Amongst..Contextual Data Administrative UnitsOur respondents reside in different administrative neighbourhoods (`buurten’), diverse administrative districts (`wijken’) and in distinct administrative municipalities.The number of respondent suffices with res.