Ion we examined the connection between mothers’ mental state utterances and MedChemExpress Isoginkgetin children’s semantic and conceptual capabilities, though controlling for children’s age in months, children’s gender, mothers’ empathy, and children’s temperament. The model didn’t significantly predict children’s conceptual and semantic skills, except that Contextualization. In Contextualization case, a considerable regression equation was found [F (20, 29) = 2.262; p 0.5] with an R2 of 0.61. Children’s age was essentially the most relevant variable in determining a adjust in Contextualization performance ( = 0.56; t = 3.367; p 0.01; 95 CI: 0.084.346); as children’s age increases by 1 month, Contextualization increases by 0.215. Offered that we discovered children’s efficiency in Contextualization and Definitional tasks to be influenced by their age, we wanted to find out how maternal lexicon (dependentFrontiers in Psychology www.frontiersin.orgMarch 2016 Volume 7 ArticleRollo and SullaMaternal Talk in Cognitive DevelopmentTABLE four Correlations in between children’s frequency of mental state utterances and their conceptual performances. Children’s mental state words Contex (1) Good Emotional (two) Adverse Emotional (three) Cognitive (4) Perceptual (5) Moral (6) Obligation (7) Volitional (8) Capability (9) Physiological (ten) Emotional Displays (11) Communicative-0.03 0.21 0.09 -0.21 0.08 0.30 0.03 -0.01 -0.01 -0.25 -0.Children’s’ Semantic-Conceptual Performances Class-0.15 0.09 0.23 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.ten 0.Expl-0.17 0.ten 0.28 -0.04 0.17 0.20 0.22 -0.02 -0.02 -0.12 0.Words-0.07 0.34 0.28 -0.09 -0.01 0.31 0.03 0.19 0.19 PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21384531 -0.21 0.Assoc-0.17 0.06 -0.04 0.13 0.12 0.18 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.Tax-0.11 0.20 0.09 -0.06 -0.08 0.12 -0.02 -0.29 -0.29 -0.14 0.Arb0.06 0.23 0.26 0.03 -0.22 -0.02 -0.20 0.20 0.20 -0.09 -0.Def-0.16 0.28 -0.01 -0.18 0.29 0.44 0.32 -0.05 -0.05 -0.08 0.p 0.05; p 0.01, N = 50. Legend: Contex, Contextualization activity; Class, Classification task; Expl, Explanation process; Words, Words memory task; Assoc, Associative relationship; Tax, Taxonomic relationship; Arb, Arbitrary relationship; Def, Definitional activity.variable) changes according to both children’s contextualization and definitional scores at various ages. In each age group, we split both Contextualization and Definitional scores in “high scores” (50 percentile) and “low scores” (50 percentile), according to the comparison between the scores in this sample and normative scores (Bellacchi et al., 2010). Because the two groups were not balanced, we ran the Mann-Whitney U-Test and also the analysis revealed that, as regard the Contextualization tasks, there have been no statistically substantial variations in maternal lexicon when younger young children (3-4 years old) had high scores (N = 18) or low scores (N = eight). Nevertheless, it appears that the mothers addressed lexical categories preferentially to their child, once they were in the “low scores” category (p = 0.045), or preferentially to the principal character in the story, when young children were inside the “high scores” category (p = 0.045). As regard older young children (5-6 years old), the ANOVA revealed a statistically important distinction between the two groups in Capability (e.g., to become capable or to try): the mothers whose children had had high scores (N = 12) had been made use of to utilizing capacity state words more [F (1, 22) = 6881; p = 0.016] than the mothers whose young children had had low scores (N = 12). As regard the younger children’s (3-4 years old) Definitional tasks, the Mann-Whitney U-Test showed stati.