Admit different behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders ought to not be blurred, thereby avoiding the introduction of a (reprehensible) element on the street (disease, condom) inside the property space.Prevention techniques: “risk groups, lady of your residence, and condom”We have noticed that minimizing the severity of AIDS did not prevent its which means as a threat. However, this threat is bounded by the notion of “risk group” and by the category of “street” (as opposed to “home”). So, it’s within the middle of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261711 this range of which means that the protection methods, stated by the respondents, acquire sense and orientation major towards the adoption of exclusive (but unprotected) sex with all the “woman on the house”, or perhaps the usage of condoms with “women with the street”. Individuals identified by respondents as belonging to “risk groups” Madrasin site nonetheless refer to the classic groups identified by epidemiologists during the initial phase of the epidemic, within the late 1980s: homosexuals, drug users, and sex specialists. Respondents exclude “women of the house” and themselves from these groups, indicating low self-perception of risk. She (wife) has the confidence that I am on the road, but alone. And I also have self-assurance that she also respects me and is alone. (…) We are not (…) a part of the risk group (…) they’re individuals who use drugs (…) with many partners. (r. ten, 51 years old) Hence, avoiding sexual relations with quite a few persons in particular, “prostitutes, females on the street, and fags” restricting them (practically) exclusively to the “woman in the house”, was deemed by respondents as a fantastic preventive tactic, even though it can be of tough execution. I feel it prevents [AIDS], once you don’t go out with any lady however the woman with the property. (…) Through the woman a single gets it also, but in the fag is a lot more assured. (r. 7, 49 years old) Respondents categorize subjects and circumstances, present in their contexts of social interaction, to measure distinct degrees of threat. The category “woman on the house” will not be restricted only towards the wife, also involving women which have precise attributes with the space of the “house”. This is, for that reason, a “language of relations” (greater than substantive attribute!) as Goffman advocates about stigma a language created in a broader web of meanings. Certainly one of the respondents, by way of example, does not use condoms within the extramarital relationship having a “girlfriend”. The truth that the “girlfriend” is married to a different man (taking the place of “woman from the house”), also to the long term “dating”, justifies for him the unprotected sex. When I am dating at times it passes, without the need of a condom. But not anybody (…) There’s a woman … but I know her for nine years (…) Occasionally, I never use condom, no. But if I get a lady I never know, I’ve to work with. (…) She’s a married lady. (…) I always pass by there, I see her all the time. (r. 12, 54 years old) We see that the use of condoms, although not constant, is additional connected towards the space of the “street”, as a way to meet the so-called “men’s needs” for sex, possibly a lot more present in long routes. Many in the ladies who populate the contexts of social interaction of truck drivers, in particular those involved with sexual service, are viewed as to become “anyone”; thatDOI:10.1590S1518-8787.Vulnerability of truck drivers to HIVAIDSMagno L Castellanos MEPis, as somebody with no bonds and who has no significant issues with the danger of infection by ailments “rotten women” within the words of a inte.