Sion model analysis allows the creation of Story Lines that can contribute to a deep-structure analysis that moves “beyond description to conceptualization” (Strauss Corbin, 1990, p. 120). The IMM Story Line analysis is similar to the Grounded Theory Story Line analysis, which is used to generate “a descriptive story about the central phenomenon of the study” (Strauss Corbin, 1990, p. 119). Contrasting story lines by levels of life satisfaction–Table 3 presents the macho self-identification responses for a set of contrasting groups analysis. Narrative responses are presented in a stratified analysis for five cases having the highest Life Satisfaction Scale scores as contrasted with the five lowest scoring cases (Kellison, 2009). This is a form of purposive sampling that examines quotes involving machismo self-identification, based on the finding that this variable was significantly associated with the outcome variable of Life Satisfaction. This then allows us to “learn as much as possible about the outliers” (Gelo et al., 2008, p. 275). In this particular contrasting groups analysis, Story Line 1 for members of the highest-scoring strata of cases on Life Satisfaction voices Zebularine dose positive machismo selfidentification themes that involve caballerismo (chivalry; Arciniega et al., 2008) and responsibility to family: “For me it’s acting like a gentleman” and “I do my best to take care of my family” (see Table 3). In contrast, Story Line 2 from the lowest-scoring strata of cases voices negative machismo themes that involve selfishness, irresponsibility, and antisocial conduct: “I don’t identify with working hard or taking care of my family”; “I’m lazy, I’m selfish, I have a short fuse”; and “I have low self-esteem.” These contrasting Story Lines reveal the presence of high life satisfaction among family-oriented responsible males, asNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.Pagecontrasted with low life satisfaction among males who lack RR6 chemical information family involvement and who are irresponsible.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptStatus and Areas for RefinementSome Challenges and Limitations Adequate data gathering–Despite the stated advantages offered by the IMM approach, several challenges exist. One challenge involves the need for effective interview data collection that requires adequate probing after an initial focus question response. Insufficient probing will produce limited verbal responses and subsequently will yield shallow and uninformative thematic categories.12 A focus question should include one or more probes, for example, “please tell me more about that,” which will generate a more complete response from which to construct sound thematic categories. Skewness in thematic variables–Thematic categories and their derived thematic variables that exhibit remarkable skew, that is, a skewness value of 2.0 of higher, can be regarded as “weak thematic variables,” when skew is driven by many zero values that indicate a large proportion of null responses involving “no-mentions.” From the quantitative perspective, weak thematic variables will likely violate basic assumptions of normality necessary to test linear regression models (Cohen et al., 2003), and often these variables yield nonsignificant results in correlational and multiple regression analyses. Cross-sample stability, validity, and replicab.Sion model analysis allows the creation of Story Lines that can contribute to a deep-structure analysis that moves “beyond description to conceptualization” (Strauss Corbin, 1990, p. 120). The IMM Story Line analysis is similar to the Grounded Theory Story Line analysis, which is used to generate “a descriptive story about the central phenomenon of the study” (Strauss Corbin, 1990, p. 119). Contrasting story lines by levels of life satisfaction–Table 3 presents the macho self-identification responses for a set of contrasting groups analysis. Narrative responses are presented in a stratified analysis for five cases having the highest Life Satisfaction Scale scores as contrasted with the five lowest scoring cases (Kellison, 2009). This is a form of purposive sampling that examines quotes involving machismo self-identification, based on the finding that this variable was significantly associated with the outcome variable of Life Satisfaction. This then allows us to “learn as much as possible about the outliers” (Gelo et al., 2008, p. 275). In this particular contrasting groups analysis, Story Line 1 for members of the highest-scoring strata of cases on Life Satisfaction voices positive machismo selfidentification themes that involve caballerismo (chivalry; Arciniega et al., 2008) and responsibility to family: “For me it’s acting like a gentleman” and “I do my best to take care of my family” (see Table 3). In contrast, Story Line 2 from the lowest-scoring strata of cases voices negative machismo themes that involve selfishness, irresponsibility, and antisocial conduct: “I don’t identify with working hard or taking care of my family”; “I’m lazy, I’m selfish, I have a short fuse”; and “I have low self-esteem.” These contrasting Story Lines reveal the presence of high life satisfaction among family-oriented responsible males, asNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.Pagecontrasted with low life satisfaction among males who lack family involvement and who are irresponsible.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptStatus and Areas for RefinementSome Challenges and Limitations Adequate data gathering–Despite the stated advantages offered by the IMM approach, several challenges exist. One challenge involves the need for effective interview data collection that requires adequate probing after an initial focus question response. Insufficient probing will produce limited verbal responses and subsequently will yield shallow and uninformative thematic categories.12 A focus question should include one or more probes, for example, “please tell me more about that,” which will generate a more complete response from which to construct sound thematic categories. Skewness in thematic variables–Thematic categories and their derived thematic variables that exhibit remarkable skew, that is, a skewness value of 2.0 of higher, can be regarded as “weak thematic variables,” when skew is driven by many zero values that indicate a large proportion of null responses involving “no-mentions.” From the quantitative perspective, weak thematic variables will likely violate basic assumptions of normality necessary to test linear regression models (Cohen et al., 2003), and often these variables yield nonsignificant results in correlational and multiple regression analyses. Cross-sample stability, validity, and replicab.