Ost all race and ethnicity groups, albeit weaker for Mexican Americans following age (Fig Supplementary Fig.S).The associations of participant traits with person morphologic optic disc attributes had been evaluated among the participants whose optic pictures were reviewed at Johns Hopkins University (Table ; Supplementary Table S).The associations were mostly constant involving left and correct eye.NonHispanic blacks, other races, and participants with CDR .were much less likely to have a modest disc size.Disc hemorrhage, excavation, and notching had been additional likely to occur in participants who had been older, had CDR or had glaucoma.The prevalence of tilted disc was reduced in participants with CDR but was not statistically connected with glaucoma diagnosis.Among the participants with glaucoma, only CL29926 manufacturer reported a preceding diagnosis of glaucoma ( Table).Those that had been unaware of glaucoma status were a lot more probably to become younger, to possess a tiny disc, and to have an abnormal FDT result and were less likely to possess notching or disc hemorrhages compared with those having a selfreported diagnosis.Among participants without the need of glaucoma, reported a previous diagnosis of glaucoma ( Table).Those that reported a prior diagnosis of glaucoma were older and much more likely to become nonHispanic black, to have an abnormal FDT test, and to have notch of the optic nerve.They had been also much less likely to be educated and to possess private insurance only or no insurance compared with participants who correctly selfidentified as not obtaining glaucoma.The good and adverse predictive values of selfreport of a glaucoma diagnosis have been .and respectively.TABLE .Odds Ratio (CI) for Disc Morphology Abnormalities (Correct Eye) inside the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Compact vs.Normal Disc Size Disc Hemorrhage . reference . reference . . . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . . . reference . . . reference . reference reference reference . reference . . . Excavation Any Notch Tilted . reference . reference . . . reference . reference . reference . . reference . reference . . . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . reference . . . reference . . Massive vs.Regular Disc SizeNo.casestotal no.Age, with y improve SexMale FemaleRaceethnicityGlaucoma Prevalence in the United StatesWhite Black Mexican American OtherGlaucoma by selfreportNo YesGlaucoma by optic disc gradingNo YesVertical CDR .No Yes Age, sex, and ethnicity are assessed with each other within the most important model.Among total subjects with glaucoma grading, participants had disc size and notch grading, participants had disc hemorrhage evaluation, and had excavation evaluation.Information are odds ratios (self-assurance intervals).Every single glaucoma indicator was included in separate models adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.IOVS j May j Vol.j No.jGlaucoma Prevalence within the United StatesIOVS j May well j Vol.j No.jTABLE .Participant Qualities and Disc Morphology by SelfReported Glaucoma Status Among Individuals With Glaucoma Determined in Fundus Photographs in the National Wellness and Nutrition Examination Survey Glaucoma by Fundus Photograph SelfReport Glaucoma, n Age, y Female sex, Raceethnicity, White Black Mexican American Other Poverty PIR , Education higher school, Lack access, Insurance coverage, Private only Private and gov.Government only None Insurance for age , Private PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21576237 only Private and gov.Government only None Insuranc.