Is about?” “What will you be required to do during this study?” “What are the risks of participating in this study?”). PD0325901 site participants can then access the PD150606 web consent documents at any time on the study website. Parents and children who consent to participate are given separate and unique logins to the secure intervention website. In the Let’s Chat Pain study, participants and their parents consent via email, a common approach to obtaining consent in internet research (Fox et al., 2007). PD0325901 site However, this method presents several potential problems. First, email consent has been criticized as easily ignorable by participants when used in research (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002) but may be subject to similar to constraints as paper consent (Adair, Dushenko, Lindsay, 1985). Furthermore, the use of email means that researchers must trust that those giving consent are who they say they are (Zhang, 1999). Researchers are also not able to confirm that participants have an adequate understanding of the study procedures buy PF-04418948 through email alone. Although the ethics committee of the University of Bath debated this possibility for the Let’s Chat Pain Study, it was decided that risks associated with email consent were similar to the risk of a nonparent signing a consent form in a postal survey (Fox et al., 2007). These two exemplar studies used contrasting methods of obtaining informed consent (email versus phone). One advantage of a telephone method, as in the Web MAP study, is that participant identities could be confirmed by the referring health care provider and the parent. Furthermore, conducting consent over the telephone allows for the use of back-questioning to ensure thatparticipants are sufficiently informed when they consent to participate in the study.DebriefingMany researchers choose to send an e-mail or to use a pop-up tool to provide debriefing information at the completion of the study or of the individuals’ participation (Fox et al., 2007). In Let’s Chat Pain, following their participation, all adolescents were sent the details of a number of organizations they could seek help from if distressed in any way after participating in the study. “Debriefing” methods such as this have been criticized as easily ignorable by participants (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002). However, even in face-to-face research, participants may pay only cursory attention to “debrief” forms (Adair et al., 1985). As in face-to-face research, attempts should be made to ensure that all participants, even those who withdraw from the study, are fully and adequately “debriefed” and offered appropriate referral in the event of significant distress. Best practice in e-health research should involve the use of multiple “debrief” methods (e.g., email, pop-up “debrief,” telephone contact), preferably in a format that allows participants to ask questions and provide feedback to the researcher.Privacy and ConfidentialityPrivacy is defined as the control by an individual over how their private information is used, manipulated, and disseminated (Gutwirth, 2002). Psychologists practice the maintenance of the privacy of research participants by ensuring the confidentiality of individuals’ identifying information and the secure storage of all data. The violation of research participants’ privacy and anonymity through errors in data protection can have serious consequences for the personal lives of the participants, and can d.Is about?” “What will you be required to do during this study?” “What are the risks of participating in this study?”). Participants can then access the consent documents at any time on the study website. Parents and children who consent to participate are given separate and unique logins to the secure intervention website. In the Let’s Chat Pain study, participants and their parents consent via email, a common approach to obtaining consent in internet research (Fox et al., 2007). However, this method presents several potential problems. First, email consent has been criticized as easily ignorable by participants when used in research (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002) but may be subject to similar to constraints as paper consent (Adair, Dushenko, Lindsay, 1985). Furthermore, the use of email means that researchers must trust that those giving consent are who they say they are (Zhang, 1999). Researchers are also not able to confirm that participants have an adequate understanding of the study procedures through email alone. Although the ethics committee of the University of Bath debated this possibility for the Let’s Chat Pain Study, it was decided that risks associated with email consent were similar to the risk of a nonparent signing a consent form in a postal survey (Fox et al., 2007). These two exemplar studies used contrasting methods of obtaining informed consent (email versus phone). One advantage of a telephone method, as in the Web MAP study, is that participant identities could be confirmed by the referring health care provider and the parent. Furthermore, conducting consent over the telephone allows for the use of back-questioning to ensure thatparticipants are sufficiently informed when they consent to participate in the study.DebriefingMany researchers choose to send an e-mail or to use a pop-up tool to provide debriefing information at the completion of the study or of the individuals’ participation (Fox et al., 2007). In Let’s Chat Pain, following their participation, all adolescents were sent the details of a number of organizations they could seek help from if distressed in any way after participating in the study. “Debriefing” methods such as this have been criticized as easily ignorable by participants (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002). However, even in face-to-face research, participants may pay only cursory attention to “debrief” forms (Adair et al., 1985). As in face-to-face research, attempts should be made to ensure that all participants, even those who withdraw from the study, are fully and adequately “debriefed” and offered appropriate referral in the event of significant distress. Best practice in e-health research should involve the use of multiple “debrief” methods (e.g., email, pop-up “debrief,” telephone contact), preferably in a format that allows participants to ask questions and provide feedback to the researcher.Privacy and ConfidentialityPrivacy is defined as the control by an individual over how their private information is used, manipulated, and disseminated (Gutwirth, 2002). Psychologists practice the maintenance of the privacy of research participants by ensuring the confidentiality of individuals’ identifying information and the secure storage of all data. The violation of research participants’ privacy and anonymity through errors in data protection can have serious consequences for the personal lives of the participants, and can d.Is about?” “What will you be required to do during this study?” “What are the risks of participating in this study?”). Participants can then access the consent documents at any time on the study website. Parents and children who consent to participate are given separate and unique logins to the secure intervention website. In the Let’s Chat Pain study, participants and their parents consent via email, a common approach to obtaining consent in internet research (Fox et al., 2007). However, this method presents several potential problems. First, email consent has been criticized as easily ignorable by participants when used in research (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002) but may be subject to similar to constraints as paper consent (Adair, Dushenko, Lindsay, 1985). Furthermore, the use of email means that researchers must trust that those giving consent are who they say they are (Zhang, 1999). Researchers are also not able to confirm that participants have an adequate understanding of the study procedures through email alone. Although the ethics committee of the University of Bath debated this possibility for the Let’s Chat Pain Study, it was decided that risks associated with email consent were similar to the risk of a nonparent signing a consent form in a postal survey (Fox et al., 2007). These two exemplar studies used contrasting methods of obtaining informed consent (email versus phone). One advantage of a telephone method, as in the Web MAP study, is that participant identities could be confirmed by the referring health care provider and the parent. Furthermore, conducting consent over the telephone allows for the use of back-questioning to ensure thatparticipants are sufficiently informed when they consent to participate in the study.DebriefingMany researchers choose to send an e-mail or to use a pop-up tool to provide debriefing information at the completion of the study or of the individuals’ participation (Fox et al., 2007). In Let’s Chat Pain, following their participation, all adolescents were sent the details of a number of organizations they could seek help from if distressed in any way after participating in the study. “Debriefing” methods such as this have been criticized as easily ignorable by participants (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002). However, even in face-to-face research, participants may pay only cursory attention to “debrief” forms (Adair et al., 1985). As in face-to-face research, attempts should be made to ensure that all participants, even those who withdraw from the study, are fully and adequately “debriefed” and offered appropriate referral in the event of significant distress. Best practice in e-health research should involve the use of multiple “debrief” methods (e.g., email, pop-up “debrief,” telephone contact), preferably in a format that allows participants to ask questions and provide feedback to the researcher.Privacy and ConfidentialityPrivacy is defined as the control by an individual over how their private information is used, manipulated, and disseminated (Gutwirth, 2002). Psychologists practice the maintenance of the privacy of research participants by ensuring the confidentiality of individuals’ identifying information and the secure storage of all data. The violation of research participants’ privacy and anonymity through errors in data protection can have serious consequences for the personal lives of the participants, and can d.Is about?” “What will you be required to do during this study?” “What are the risks of participating in this study?”). Participants can then access the consent documents at any time on the study website. Parents and children who consent to participate are given separate and unique logins to the secure intervention website. In the Let’s Chat Pain study, participants and their parents consent via email, a common approach to obtaining consent in internet research (Fox et al., 2007). However, this method presents several potential problems. First, email consent has been criticized as easily ignorable by participants when used in research (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002) but may be subject to similar to constraints as paper consent (Adair, Dushenko, Lindsay, 1985). Furthermore, the use of email means that researchers must trust that those giving consent are who they say they are (Zhang, 1999). Researchers are also not able to confirm that participants have an adequate understanding of the study procedures through email alone. Although the ethics committee of the University of Bath debated this possibility for the Let’s Chat Pain Study, it was decided that risks associated with email consent were similar to the risk of a nonparent signing a consent form in a postal survey (Fox et al., 2007). These two exemplar studies used contrasting methods of obtaining informed consent (email versus phone). One advantage of a telephone method, as in the Web MAP study, is that participant identities could be confirmed by the referring health care provider and the parent. Furthermore, conducting consent over the telephone allows for the use of back-questioning to ensure thatparticipants are sufficiently informed when they consent to participate in the study.DebriefingMany researchers choose to send an e-mail or to use a pop-up tool to provide debriefing information at the completion of the study or of the individuals’ participation (Fox et al., 2007). In Let’s Chat Pain, following their participation, all adolescents were sent the details of a number of organizations they could seek help from if distressed in any way after participating in the study. “Debriefing” methods such as this have been criticized as easily ignorable by participants (Battles, 2010; Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002). However, even in face-to-face research, participants may pay only cursory attention to “debrief” forms (Adair et al., 1985). As in face-to-face research, attempts should be made to ensure that all participants, even those who withdraw from the study, are fully and adequately “debriefed” and offered appropriate referral in the event of significant distress. Best practice in e-health research should involve the use of multiple “debrief” methods (e.g., email, pop-up “debrief,” telephone contact), preferably in a format that allows participants to ask questions and provide feedback to the researcher.Privacy and ConfidentialityPrivacy is defined as the control by an individual over how their private information is used, manipulated, and disseminated (Gutwirth, 2002). Psychologists practice the maintenance of the privacy of research participants by ensuring the confidentiality of individuals’ identifying information and the secure storage of all data. The violation of research participants’ privacy and anonymity through errors in data protection can have serious consequences for the personal lives of the participants, and can d.