N expressed that increased logging roads and deforestation will progressively lead to fragmentation of bonobo habitat [6]. Under such circumstances, understanding the genetic MedChemExpress 4EGI-1 structure and gene flow among bonobo populations is of utmost importance for 22948146 planning adequate conservation programs that preserve genetic diversity for the future. A previous study identifiedthe Lomami River, a large tributary of the Congo River, as a barrier to gene flow among populations [7]. Two mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) clades have been found in five wild bonobo populations [7], and a third clade of undefined wild origin has been reported in captive bonobos [1]. However, our knowledge about the genetic structure in the entire bonobo habitat range is limited. In order to define the geographical distribution of haplotypes, we collected samples at seven sites that covered a broader range than was the case in previous studies of bonobos (Figure 1), and performed genetic assessments to characterize the molecular phylogenetic features among mtDNA haplotypes and genetic differentiation within and among study populations. To examine the intraspecific genealogy in a phylogeographic framework, we collected a total of 376 fecal samples from sevenGenetic Structure of BonobosFigure 1. Study area and a population tree. Right map shows geographical location of study populations in DRC. Rivers Chebulagic acid indicated here are based on limnological study [42]. Left is a population tree constructed by UPGMA method with net population distances estimated from calculation of FST distances. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059660.gpopulations (Fig. 1), and for 136 effective samples, we compared complete sequences of noncoding regions in the mtDNA. In Africa, two evolutionary effects for diversification within a species have been reported in primates: riverine barriers [7] and Pleistocene refugia [8]. Additionally, a combined effect has been reported [9]. We investigated the evolutionary history of the genetic structure of bonobo populations by examining genetic differentiation by distance and rivers as a barrier to gene flow.Results and Discussion MtDNA HaplotypesGblock sorting of 1128 nucleotide sites in the initial alignment extracted 1121 sites (99 ) consisting of three selected blocks of flanking positions. Consequently, we distinguished 54 mtDNA haplotypes in all the samples. MtDNA haplotypes were locally clustered in the bonobo samples from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in which 45 haplotypes (83 15755315 ) were localityspecific (autoapomorphic) and only 9 (17 ) were shared (synapomorphic) by two or three populations (Figure 2). The proportion of haplotypes shared with other populations was high in the Wamba (4/6; 67 ) and Lac Tumba populations (3/6; 50 ), intermediate in the Malebo (3/8; 38 ), Lomako (5/13; 38 ), Iyondji (4/15; 27 ), and Salonga populations (1/6; 17 ), and low in the TL2 population (0/11; 0 ), suggesting temporal isolation of the TL2 population in the eastern periphery. Clustering analyses revealed six groups of haplotypes (haplogroups) in this study. Three of these groups were named A, B,and C clades in previous studies [1,7] and we newly identified D clade in this study. Since we detected two new subgroups in both the A and B clades, we renamed the new clades as A1, A2, B1, and B2, in addition to clades C and D (Figure 2). Component haplotypes of the A1, A2, B1, and B2 clades were shared by more than three study populations but those of C and D were found only in the Wam.N expressed that increased logging roads and deforestation will progressively lead to fragmentation of bonobo habitat [6]. Under such circumstances, understanding the genetic structure and gene flow among bonobo populations is of utmost importance for 22948146 planning adequate conservation programs that preserve genetic diversity for the future. A previous study identifiedthe Lomami River, a large tributary of the Congo River, as a barrier to gene flow among populations [7]. Two mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) clades have been found in five wild bonobo populations [7], and a third clade of undefined wild origin has been reported in captive bonobos [1]. However, our knowledge about the genetic structure in the entire bonobo habitat range is limited. In order to define the geographical distribution of haplotypes, we collected samples at seven sites that covered a broader range than was the case in previous studies of bonobos (Figure 1), and performed genetic assessments to characterize the molecular phylogenetic features among mtDNA haplotypes and genetic differentiation within and among study populations. To examine the intraspecific genealogy in a phylogeographic framework, we collected a total of 376 fecal samples from sevenGenetic Structure of BonobosFigure 1. Study area and a population tree. Right map shows geographical location of study populations in DRC. Rivers indicated here are based on limnological study [42]. Left is a population tree constructed by UPGMA method with net population distances estimated from calculation of FST distances. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059660.gpopulations (Fig. 1), and for 136 effective samples, we compared complete sequences of noncoding regions in the mtDNA. In Africa, two evolutionary effects for diversification within a species have been reported in primates: riverine barriers [7] and Pleistocene refugia [8]. Additionally, a combined effect has been reported [9]. We investigated the evolutionary history of the genetic structure of bonobo populations by examining genetic differentiation by distance and rivers as a barrier to gene flow.Results and Discussion MtDNA HaplotypesGblock sorting of 1128 nucleotide sites in the initial alignment extracted 1121 sites (99 ) consisting of three selected blocks of flanking positions. Consequently, we distinguished 54 mtDNA haplotypes in all the samples. MtDNA haplotypes were locally clustered in the bonobo samples from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in which 45 haplotypes (83 15755315 ) were localityspecific (autoapomorphic) and only 9 (17 ) were shared (synapomorphic) by two or three populations (Figure 2). The proportion of haplotypes shared with other populations was high in the Wamba (4/6; 67 ) and Lac Tumba populations (3/6; 50 ), intermediate in the Malebo (3/8; 38 ), Lomako (5/13; 38 ), Iyondji (4/15; 27 ), and Salonga populations (1/6; 17 ), and low in the TL2 population (0/11; 0 ), suggesting temporal isolation of the TL2 population in the eastern periphery. Clustering analyses revealed six groups of haplotypes (haplogroups) in this study. Three of these groups were named A, B,and C clades in previous studies [1,7] and we newly identified D clade in this study. Since we detected two new subgroups in both the A and B clades, we renamed the new clades as A1, A2, B1, and B2, in addition to clades C and D (Figure 2). Component haplotypes of the A1, A2, B1, and B2 clades were shared by more than three study populations but those of C and D were found only in the Wam.