Nding with PAZ domain could enhance or hinder the whole RNAi process. The main goal of this study was to explore the impact of weaker or stronger binding of siRNA on overall RNAi effects. It is proposed that stronger binding with the PAZ domain might interfere with the previously mentioned siRNA bindingrelease cycle, thereby affecting the whole RNAi process. For this purpose, we analyzed the experimentally determined in vivo activities of siRNAs produced previously by our lab and then correlated these results with computational and modeling tools. In this study, several questions have to be addressed 22948146 regarding to, what are the forces governing 3′ A-196 manufacturer recognition by PAZ domain?, what is the relation between in vivo efficacy of modified siRNAs and the binding affinity of 3′ overhangs?, the correlation between the size of modified 3′ overhangs or the total interaction surface with PAZ domain and RNAi, and finally, what is the relation between strong or weak binding with PAZ domain and RNAi?.parameters were added with the aid of AutoDock tools. Affinity ??(grid) maps of 20620620 A grid points and 0.375 A spacing were generated using the Autogrid program. AutoDock parameter setand distance-dependent dielectric functions were used in the calculation of the van der Waals and the electrostatic terms, respectively. Docking simulations were performed using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA). Initial position, orientation, and torsions of the ligand molecules were set randomly. Each docking experiment was derived from 10 different runs that were set to terminate after a maximum of 250000 energy evaluations. The population size was set to 150. During the search, a ?translational step of 0.2 A, and quaternion and torsion steps of 5 were applied.Postdocking analysis and hierarchical clustering of compoundsThe purchase Licochalcone-A compounds are ranked by combining the pharmacological interactions and energy scored function of GEMDOCK. Hierarchical clustering method is based on the docked poses (i.e. proteinligand interactions) and compound properties (i.e. atomic compositions). Atomic composition, which is similar to the amino acid composition of a protein sequence, is 23727046 a new concept for measuring compound similarity. The output file was analyzed by treeview software.Statistical analysisThe data set obtained from the computational tools was correlated with RANi efficacy. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the significance of correlation were estimated by STATA statistical package (version 12.1). The results are provided in tables 3 and 4.Methods Molecular docking studiesPreparation of compounds. Several siRNA 3′ overhang modifications were developed in our lab [22,26?2]. The structure of these compounds (as shown in Fig. 1) together with their in vivo efficacy were retrieved and subjected to further investigations including docking studies and computational tools. Compounds conformation and orientation relative to the binding site was computed by using a generic evolutionary method provided by iGEMDOC [33,34]. Cleaning and optimization of compounds conformation was carried out by ChemSketch 12.01 software (ACDlabs, Canada). Hydrogens were removed and compounds saved as Mol files after file format conversion tools available with Openbabel software version 3.2.1. Preparation of protein. The crystal structure of drosophila Ago2 was used for docking studies (PDB ID 3MJ0). The structure is containing one chain and the protein is bound with siRNA. The binding site is defined.Nding with PAZ domain could enhance or hinder the whole RNAi process. The main goal of this study was to explore the impact of weaker or stronger binding of siRNA on overall RNAi effects. It is proposed that stronger binding with the PAZ domain might interfere with the previously mentioned siRNA bindingrelease cycle, thereby affecting the whole RNAi process. For this purpose, we analyzed the experimentally determined in vivo activities of siRNAs produced previously by our lab and then correlated these results with computational and modeling tools. In this study, several questions have to be addressed 22948146 regarding to, what are the forces governing 3′ recognition by PAZ domain?, what is the relation between in vivo efficacy of modified siRNAs and the binding affinity of 3′ overhangs?, the correlation between the size of modified 3′ overhangs or the total interaction surface with PAZ domain and RNAi, and finally, what is the relation between strong or weak binding with PAZ domain and RNAi?.parameters were added with the aid of AutoDock tools. Affinity ??(grid) maps of 20620620 A grid points and 0.375 A spacing were generated using the Autogrid program. AutoDock parameter setand distance-dependent dielectric functions were used in the calculation of the van der Waals and the electrostatic terms, respectively. Docking simulations were performed using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA). Initial position, orientation, and torsions of the ligand molecules were set randomly. Each docking experiment was derived from 10 different runs that were set to terminate after a maximum of 250000 energy evaluations. The population size was set to 150. During the search, a ?translational step of 0.2 A, and quaternion and torsion steps of 5 were applied.Postdocking analysis and hierarchical clustering of compoundsThe compounds are ranked by combining the pharmacological interactions and energy scored function of GEMDOCK. Hierarchical clustering method is based on the docked poses (i.e. proteinligand interactions) and compound properties (i.e. atomic compositions). Atomic composition, which is similar to the amino acid composition of a protein sequence, is 23727046 a new concept for measuring compound similarity. The output file was analyzed by treeview software.Statistical analysisThe data set obtained from the computational tools was correlated with RANi efficacy. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the significance of correlation were estimated by STATA statistical package (version 12.1). The results are provided in tables 3 and 4.Methods Molecular docking studiesPreparation of compounds. Several siRNA 3′ overhang modifications were developed in our lab [22,26?2]. The structure of these compounds (as shown in Fig. 1) together with their in vivo efficacy were retrieved and subjected to further investigations including docking studies and computational tools. Compounds conformation and orientation relative to the binding site was computed by using a generic evolutionary method provided by iGEMDOC [33,34]. Cleaning and optimization of compounds conformation was carried out by ChemSketch 12.01 software (ACDlabs, Canada). Hydrogens were removed and compounds saved as Mol files after file format conversion tools available with Openbabel software version 3.2.1. Preparation of protein. The crystal structure of drosophila Ago2 was used for docking studies (PDB ID 3MJ0). The structure is containing one chain and the protein is bound with siRNA. The binding site is defined.