Ns (Methods). As shown in Fig. 3 (black curve), the average pathway can also be projected onto the two interdomain distances. Because the transitions in the individual unrestrained simulations are different, some sections of this average pathway are actually not frequently visited in those simulations. We note, however, that in our sampling simulations, the restraint only acts along the curve direction (see Methods), and does not force the conformation perpendicularly towards the curve. In each restrained simulation, the protein conformation is thus free to explore the dimensions orthogonal to the curve, and does not necessarily settle on the curve itself. We also note that when properly sampled, the free energy difference between two states should not depend on the specific pathway (route) through which the free energy is integrated. To examine the sampled Lecirelin site conformations in the restrained simulations, we calculate the average Ca coordinates from the trajectory in each umbrella window, and compared them with the crystal structures of AdK. The RMSD values in Fig. 5 indicate that conformations near the two crystal structures have indeed been sampled in the expected umbrella windows (with small RMSDs). Moreover, because the unrestrained simulations visited a large conformational space, our pathway curve extends beyond the crystal structures, especially at the open-state end (Figs. 3 and 5). As shown in Fig. 6, the free energy overall represents a valley with a single 18204824 minimum. The location of the energetic minimum, with a reduced curve parameter a , 0.43, is almost exactly at the open-state crystal structure (a, 0.42, green dashed line), and agrees well with the sampled conformations (Fig. 2A) in the unrestrained simulations. Remarkably, with the bound ATP analog removed, the closed-state crystal structure (a , 0.99, red dashed line) no longer represents a metastable state, as it is not in a local free energy minimum. The monotonic energy landscape there is consistent with our finding that all unrestrainedsimulations (Fig. 2, B and C) initiated from the closed state drifted away from that state and moved to varying extents toward the open state. As shown in Fig. 5, the free energy at the closed state is ,13 kcal/mol above the energetic minimum. This large free energy is consistent with the fact that no unrestrained simulation initiated from the open state ever approached the closed state.DiscussionIn this study, we applied the concepts in the finite-temperature string method [25,26] to characterize the conformational freeFigure 5. A comparison of the average conformations from the umbrella-sampling simulations to the crystal structures. Average Ca coordinates for each of the 30 umbrella windows were calculated from the trajectories. The RMSDs between these average Ca coordinates and the two crystal structures are plotted in the figure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068023.gAdenylate Kinase ConformationFigure 6. Free energy profile of AdK conformations. The free energy G ?was defined along a conformational pathway (see Methods), and calculated from the umbrella-sampling simulations. The plotted error bars are for the free energy difference with respect to the first umbrella window at a = 0, estimated from the statistical uncertainties in the mean coordinate [40]. The green and red dashed lines indicate the projected get AKT inhibitor 2 locations of the open and closed crystal structures, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068023.genergy of AdK. By mapping the p.Ns (Methods). As shown in Fig. 3 (black curve), the average pathway can also be projected onto the two interdomain distances. Because the transitions in the individual unrestrained simulations are different, some sections of this average pathway are actually not frequently visited in those simulations. We note, however, that in our sampling simulations, the restraint only acts along the curve direction (see Methods), and does not force the conformation perpendicularly towards the curve. In each restrained simulation, the protein conformation is thus free to explore the dimensions orthogonal to the curve, and does not necessarily settle on the curve itself. We also note that when properly sampled, the free energy difference between two states should not depend on the specific pathway (route) through which the free energy is integrated. To examine the sampled conformations in the restrained simulations, we calculate the average Ca coordinates from the trajectory in each umbrella window, and compared them with the crystal structures of AdK. The RMSD values in Fig. 5 indicate that conformations near the two crystal structures have indeed been sampled in the expected umbrella windows (with small RMSDs). Moreover, because the unrestrained simulations visited a large conformational space, our pathway curve extends beyond the crystal structures, especially at the open-state end (Figs. 3 and 5). As shown in Fig. 6, the free energy overall represents a valley with a single 18204824 minimum. The location of the energetic minimum, with a reduced curve parameter a , 0.43, is almost exactly at the open-state crystal structure (a, 0.42, green dashed line), and agrees well with the sampled conformations (Fig. 2A) in the unrestrained simulations. Remarkably, with the bound ATP analog removed, the closed-state crystal structure (a , 0.99, red dashed line) no longer represents a metastable state, as it is not in a local free energy minimum. The monotonic energy landscape there is consistent with our finding that all unrestrainedsimulations (Fig. 2, B and C) initiated from the closed state drifted away from that state and moved to varying extents toward the open state. As shown in Fig. 5, the free energy at the closed state is ,13 kcal/mol above the energetic minimum. This large free energy is consistent with the fact that no unrestrained simulation initiated from the open state ever approached the closed state.DiscussionIn this study, we applied the concepts in the finite-temperature string method [25,26] to characterize the conformational freeFigure 5. A comparison of the average conformations from the umbrella-sampling simulations to the crystal structures. Average Ca coordinates for each of the 30 umbrella windows were calculated from the trajectories. The RMSDs between these average Ca coordinates and the two crystal structures are plotted in the figure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068023.gAdenylate Kinase ConformationFigure 6. Free energy profile of AdK conformations. The free energy G ?was defined along a conformational pathway (see Methods), and calculated from the umbrella-sampling simulations. The plotted error bars are for the free energy difference with respect to the first umbrella window at a = 0, estimated from the statistical uncertainties in the mean coordinate [40]. The green and red dashed lines indicate the projected locations of the open and closed crystal structures, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068023.genergy of AdK. By mapping the p.